Framing the Knight-Mozilla Fellowship

OpenNewsThis was my first week at my brand new job as a Knight-Mozilla Fellow and I can tell you already that it is going to be an awesome time. I’ve worked in a newsroom once before, as an intern in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette back during my undergraduate years, but I have a lot to learn and things feel very different here (bigger, more developers, fewer Steelers jerseys, etc.).

I started the process by meeting with Mike Krolak. He is the man responsible for the technology related to product at The Boston Globe. This means web sites, but also things like printing presses, delivery trucks, and employee management systems. I’ll be starting my fellowship in one of his teams, which is the reason why I ended my first day with an ID badge, credentials, and access to most systems. Impressive, most impressive.

When we talked over lunch he was clearly curious to learn more about my purpose and personal goals, at which point I said “you and me both, bub” and stared awkwardly past his head. What I actually did was share my high level understanding of the Fellowship: it’s an experiment, but the goals are to help technologists learn what it is like to work in the journalism industry and to infiltrate and destroy newsrooms get newsrooms more comfortable with external collaboration and open development. Really we’re figuring out the details as we go along.

I got to learn a little more about Mike, what motivates him, and why he has spent more than a decade working for The Boston Globe. Here are three of my favorite points:

  • There are so many simple, unsolved problems. Mike has a math background (I’m wary to tell people with actual math backgrounds that I was a math minor, but I was immediately able to relate), and one of the things that motivate math geeks is unsolved problems. In fact, the quest for the perfect proof can cause them to actually go insane! Mike sees the news industry as a great way to go mad, with tons of challenges ripe for the picking. A prime example: “did you know that there isn’t one major newspaper in the world that can tell you how many papers they distributed today?”
  • Technology done wrong can get in the way of good journalism. I feel silly admitting this, but the idea that technology could actually hinder the way a newsroom produces content had never crossed my mind. For example many papers have publication processes that force articles through up to 50 different systems. Each transition leaves room for accidental content modification which results in more edits. What you get by the end is a professional version of whisper down the lane (or “telephone” for you non-Pennsylvanians).
  • Newspapers are getting more comfortable with innovation. As you probably know already, when the Internet got popular the News industry sat around fat and happy and tried to use it in the same way they used any medium: to publish their content. In the past 10 years we have seen the advent of R&D departments and research spaces in newsrooms. There is a lot of catchup to do, but at least they’re trying.

For me these points frame the essence of the OpenNews initiative. Now that newspapers are innovating we want them to take a page from the mathematicians and make sure unsolved problems get solved in a way that everyone can learn from, expand upon, and contribute to (e.g. by publishing them to the world). As fellows we are also trying to understand what technology means for journalism and to share our lessons about where it can help and where it can hurt.

About Dan

Dan's just this guy, you know?

, ,

  • JHeasly

    As for not knowing down-to-the-copy how many print papers were distributed on a given day, if there were a business reason to know the figure to that precision, then I think that figure could be available. A given newspaper probably doesn’t know how many vowels are in a given edition either, but if there were a money-making business reason to know, I think that nut would get cracked.

    And to your second point, after 17 years working on newspaper Web sites, I’ve seen far more hindering technology than helpful. By a ginormous margin. Mostly because for the majority of that time, the Web sites were/are produced by print systems and workflows being re-purposed to create Web content. As Web content wasn’t the design-intent of the systems, they were/are horribly suited.

    The other major hindrance is that the creative production people running these systems are paid/rated/rewarded for the job they do producing the print product mostlyy using technology primarily designed to produce a print product. The Web content made in tandem with/by these systems, either through original design intent or via the creative application of duct tape and bailing wire, is by and large an out-of-sight, out-of-mind work product.

    But I’m really interested in reading about your experiences and getting your fresh impressions, so if you keep writing, I’ll keep reading!

    Cheers,
    John

  • http://twitter.com/maboa Mark Boas

    Fine article Mr Slifty Sir. As a fellow traveller on this wild adventure I have had similar experiences and share both your optimism tempered by a healthy does of wariness.
    “There are so many simple, unsolved problems.”
    Fine article Mr Slifty Sir. As a fellow traveller on this wild adventure I have had similar experiences and share both your optimism tempered by a healthy does of wariness.

    “There are so many simple, unsolved problems.”

    So right. There is just so much that could be done! At Al Jazeera English I was told all I need do is pick an area and I would be able to improve it.

    “Technology done wrong can get in the way of good journalism.”

    I had the privilege of sitting next to somebody as they put together an article and watched them copy and paste things in and out of notepad to sanitise the content that was being taken from various sources.

    “Newspapers are getting more comfortable with innovation.”

    Also my experience — and I’m lumping aljazeera.com into the newspaper category — I think the lines between journalists and technologists are becoming increasingly blurred and that can only be a good thing!

    Something tells me you’re are going to enjoy your time at the Boston Globe!