Comments for Sorry for the Spam

Comment on A Tor of the Dark Web by Counter Globalist

Counter Globalist — Sun, 02 Oct 2016 16:37:00 +0000

In reply to whatever.

Censorship is imposed on another person via force.
Your argument is self defeating.
Using force against other humans is wrong.

Comment on A Tor of the Dark Web by mason hack

mason hack — Sat, 28 May 2016 22:17:00 +0000

HIRE A PROFESSIONAL HACKER masonhack@sigaint.org
For all your hacking needs
Hack school grades, clear criminal records, crack bank accounts, foreign transfers, hack public records, tracking, company breaches, hack smartphone, clear bad credit, buy credit cards, key logging, hack iCloud, hack email accounts, ethical hacking, hack Facebook, hack twitter, hack instagram?
contact immediately * masonhack@sigaint.org * masonhack8@gmail.com *

Comment on The Technology Behind the World’s Worst DVR by Tara Calishain

Tara Calishain — Fri, 13 May 2016 00:35:00 +0000

Any tech article that makes me laugh gets extra credit.

“Remember that time you were watching Netflix and you blacked out because your cat sucker-punched you?”

Comment on A Puntitled Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Puns by rfong'12

rfong'12 — Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:51:00 +0000

In reply to Daniel Schultz.

Slant references seem difficult because they’re simultaneously underconstrained and have high semantic dimensionality.

Mapping “hate accessories” to “kill the messenger” has some pretty expensive steps, which might be reduced by storing word-sense-similarity lookups much looser than synonymity
– very loose semantic association between “hate” and “kill”
– one word sense of “accessories” is a hypernym of a phrase containing “messenger”

Comment on A Puntitled Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Puns by elplatt

elplatt — Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:50:00 +0000

Proposal 1: modifier for the number of interpretations that are mutually, semantically consistent.

Comment on A Puntitled Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Puns by Daniel Schultz

Daniel Schultz — Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:47:00 +0000

In reply to rfong'12. This is all awesome -- also, FWIW you might be able to generate slant references by analyzing a corpus for commonly repeated phrases.

Comment on A Puntitled Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Puns by rfong'12

rfong'12 — Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:42:00 +0000

Ugh I thought my friend invented the n-dimensional pun terminology. Thanks for collating these into one place! I think it’d be funnier (and more NLP-relevant) to refer to “dual definitions” as “word-sense re-ambiguation”. Slant references sound difficult to achieve programmatically.

I’ve been doing a lot of what I call “shittyNLP” recently, which is just simple deterministic messing around with text for amusement purposes.

You might enjoy my Pun Assistinator (phonetic superstring lookup) – http://rfong.github.io/pun/
and this portmanteau generator (or couple name generator for your friends) – https://gist.github.com/rfong/1188f5128d6e443ede98

Comment on A Puntitled Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Puns by Jonathan Bobrow

Jonathan Bobrow — Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:58:00 +0000

Just wanted to add a great series of illustrated puns… http://oddowl.com/#/square-dance/ and http://oddowl.com/#/baroque-oli/

Comment on Introducing Opened Captions by Daniel Schultz

Daniel Schultz — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:36:00 +0000

In reply to Nick Poulos.

It’s up now! Sorry for not mentioning sooner — and the uptime is now better… should last for a while now

Comment on Introducing Opened Captions by Dan

Dan — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:35:42 +0000

In reply to Nick Poulos.

It’s up now! Sorry for not mentioning sooner — and the uptime is now better… should last for a while now